Search results

316 steel is a great option, you should not be afraid of it. there's no sense in a 904l steel rep with a trash movement. get what I mean? it's to the steel you should be considering in a rep. it's the whole technical profile that really matters...

Go with the nautilus Patek. You can never go wrong with this model and it matches greatly all your requirements. And there's high chance to get a great one under 1k, don't worry about that. For as much as 600$ you can get a really good AAA grade rep, with 90% similarity in design and pretty nice...

sapphire comforts me better. looks more expensive ( and is more expensive, actually). Great shine and good serviceability

oh my god))) why are you, being so in love with replica watches (as you are on a replica forum), recommending everything but reps? 😖😖😖😖 you discredit reps completely. if you are so eager for vintages, new, and pre-owned watches, why don't you just leave this forum??🤌🤌 back to the root question...

every of my watches is serviced in a different way... theory dense match reality at all. from all my experience, I never serviced my watches according to a fixed schedule. some of them required frequent service, others- not even once have been left at the service shop. it's an individual matter...

Funny how you guys discredit the Tudor for not moving the date to the left. I think their work was harder to adapt the movement to apply the crown on the left while keeping the system the same for the date window. Rolex, in this case, was kinda lazier…it simply rotated the whole movement to 180...

Keeping maintenance costs in mind with second-hand watches is indeed relevant. Given that most pre-owned is vintage, it’s likely to require not only periodic but frequent maintenance as well. Also, the “seller” is important. Ideally, these have to have a physical showroom where u can inspect the...

close it...

GS: great mechanical skills. The 3180 movements proved it excellently, being compliant with the bureaux officials de control de l Marche des Montres. In terms of classics, grand Seiko excels, but Rolex could never create high classic pieces, at the height of its self-proclaimed status. Surprised...

do u really find this steel G-shock ugly? I find it phenomenal 🫠

My officemate has a 10-year-old rep and still operates smoothly. Of course, he doesn’t wear it now since 0 years ago reps were kinda sh*itty, sorry :D the point is that its movement is still functional, only that the physical condition is already worn off completely. Modern reps are made of...

nice piece of info... it's soo interactive talking to a dealer that is trying to fool you when you are familiarized with all possible threats :D its very interesting looking at him how he loses arguments with each counter-argument you you throw in his face :D so, yes, getting educated is getting...

C’mon))) how many people around u afford to buy a gen?))) there’s nothing to be ashamed of when wearing a rep. Plenty of people do and we don’t even know it. Their negative opinion doesn’t really affect me, it’s their opinion. Meanwhile I enjoy my great rep)

didn't have any of them so far, so can't really share my own experience. But, for as far as I discussed with my close friends, these are pretty reliable... of course, you shouldn't expect them to resist the train passing on them, but for the daily use these behave reliably

Guys, you make my horizons wider :DDDD I see plenty of watches that I didn’t even consider and didn’t know were so fine. Even the price for some of them is incredible. Thanks a million, I think I narrowed my selection to 2-3 models. I'll search deeper about their movements and tech specs and let...

definitely statement piece) even if the watch is not the most luxurious possible and doesn't cost a fortune, i always look for something special in its design and style to emphasize my taste. I think many watch enthusiasts share the same position…if people worn watches only for their time...

name one feature that only Rolex has and no other brand does ))

no guys, don't have a professional background with this company )))) neither fired, not competitive intruder)) just don't find anything special in its watches that other brands don't have... just fancy words like Oystersteel that is is nothing else than stainless steel

nope) don't like either of them) for example the submariner Line: The bezel is too wide, and the hour hands look awful… hour numerals, just simple dots… no creative imagination for such a so-called “iconic” brand

I’ve been looking at the Zenith carbon watches lately. Didn’t impact me a lot, on the contrary, the models are pretty modest. Their main pro is definitely their lightweight. Though, watch lovers seeking lightweight might simply opt for titanium instead of stainless steel. Titanium is...