Tudor Over Rolex?

[SpiceEric]

Long story short, what would you choose: Pepsi Rolex white dial or Black Bay GMT? Or with. in other words, would you choose Tudor over Rolex? Or vice versa? Curious to know more arguments for and against... In the end, there are 2 closely related brands. The difference is only in here details of movementmenrts, but I don't think it is a critical difference as long as Tudors work as well as a Rolex .... or am I wrong and missin smth?

In love with both models, though I can't afford a Rolex until then. I was thinking of a Black Bay instead. But the thought of "I still wish it was a Rolex" doesn't leave me, so kinda afraid of this move

 

[Cinar73967]

lol.... dude, I don't think you have much choice here.... Tudor is more of a realistic option than a Rolex.... have you tried to get a Rolex? Try and you will end up buying 10 Tudors instead of one Rolex... Until you get the Rolex validation to buy a Pepsi you will wait like... 4ever. Or, you just get into a boutique, say hello to Tudor assistants and in just a sec you walk out with the watch on your wrist. I think my choice is obvious

 

[MiracuLuis]

see the pic below? guess what... planning to get it right after I find a buyer for my sub... don't me ask me why...

 

[StevenOhio]

i guess i'd rather get 3-4 different Tudors for variation instead of one Rolex. if i get 1 rolex, no chance to get another watch soon

 

[Fisher]

i guess i'd rather get 3-4 different Tudors for variation instead of one Rolex. if i get 1 rolex, no chance to get another watch soon

until a certain moment) if you always follow this principle, you will probably never get to have something truly worthy and valuable. Normally, we have to reach some point when we value quality over quantity. I would like to have a perfect rolex in my 50s instead of dozens of decent but not perfect watches


It's only painful when you pay for it at first. but I'm sure that in a few months, the shock of the price will pass, and only the pleasure of being the owner of a legendary watch remains. "I wish it was a rolex" is about me

 

[Albert]

My father had some Tudors. He likes them, in-house movement, nice functionality and stuff.. but..... there not Rolex.... his words

 

[#MiniCooper#]

according to me, you can't choose between Tudor and Rolex, even if they are affiliate companies. i see your point thinking about Tudor good quality and stuff. but if we talk about prestige, Rolex is the absolute winner. The choice can be between a Rolex and a Patek, or a Rolex and an Audemars Piguet. That is, between brands with the same status on the watch scale. Tudor is a nice option, but it's still not at the rolex level. get the point? I could compare Tudor with Steinhart, but I would still choose Steinhart in the end.

 

[Ethan]

Tudor first for me... agree on the status, it's still not as cool as Rolex. But time does not favor it. I mean, Tudor has no way to be at the level of Rolex, simply because it has no way to recover the more than 100 years... However, if we look at Tudor's evolution, it develops at a very fast pace. Yes, it's true that rolex is a reliable background for Tudor... either way, Tudor watches are valuable and keep up with modern trends. Tudor for me. Rolex has many faults and is too expensive. If I saw a Tudor on someone's wrist, I would appreciate the choice without asking much "why not a Rolex?"

 

[Mathew]

would u be more explicit about Rolex and Tudor models? I guess it is too unfair to generalize without clearly specifying the model and year of release. If it's about recent releases, tbh Tudor amazes me more. Followed the Watches and wonders news this year and got impressed by it. I would not hesitate to get a BB54 and I have it in my bucket list for the following watch additions. Though, I don't know if I would find something I like from the vintage range. Rolex is more competitive here, I must admit. I would probably have more choice in the rolex collection. So, it depends on the perspective from which we are talking

 

[RoyaInk]

I have both a couple of preowned rolexes and a couple of Tudor watches. I love them all, but honestly, I wear the Tudor ones more often. They are more comfortable for my working environment.

When I wear Rolexes, I'm honestly always worried about theft concerns. I heard about theft cases in California where fake Rolexes were stolen from the owner's wrist. So, naturally, I ended up wearing them more on special occasions for less social exposure.

As for design, I like the neutral Tudoir style more than the Rolex. Those polished center links are somehow too bling for my taste. So, to confuse you even more, recommend wearing Omega

 

[StevenOhio]

I choose Tudor instead of Rolex. No offense, just looking objectively at things. Tudors have great watches for the price. The brand does a great job with modern design. Rolex is a bit behind, still looks dynamic and modern, but the classic veil is so strong and even somewhat conservative. Not to mention the availability of stores. Not only boutiques but also pop-up [shops to try on the watches you like. Tudor is slowly but surely going towards success, I don't see why I wouldn't choose a Tudor

 

[BenStone]

the same applies to: Mini Cooper or BMW? or BMW or RollsRoyce? or, if talking about tires - Firestone Or Bridgestone? Can you understand what I'm trying to tell here?

If we take the price out of the equation, obviously the Rolex branding is more luxurious and aristocratic. For superior quality, for movements, for achievements. It is true that ultimately, in practice, a Tudor works no worse than a Rolex. But the term Rolex is about achievements that Tudor still has a lot to achieve. So the power of branding is much greater)

 

[Nobbing]

if someone asks me if I would like a Rolex GMT - yes, probably, I wouldn't hesitate. But only if you receive it as a gift or smth like that. That's because I use a Tudor GMT with which I'm very happy. I neother have means nor need nor desire to get myself a Rolex. The Tudor gives me all that I need and Rolex GMT is unlikely to give me more, it would give me the same as my Tudor already does. So, I'm really enjoying my Tudor. Would a Rolex make me even happier? Objectively speaking, I really don't see how

 

[Albert]

I don't see why I should choose only one of the 2)))
I have models from both brands, reps - better said

either way, I love them equally. What's wrong with having different models? after all, it's ok to change the watches every other dAy, for diversity, or for style purposes idk...

the idea is that I love dive watches, I have some budget gens, and I'm not ready for some branded gens yet.. so, I had to settle for super clone reps, both tudor and Rolex.

Both cool, tool watches, highly functional. I want to say that both are equally appreciated, whenever I wear either of them. I never received comments like "why Tudor, if you could have bought a Rolex?!"

 

[Energybooster]

I embrace Tudor more and more in recent years. Really love what it produces and I wouldn't ask "Why a Tudor and not a Rolex?!" However, I wouldn't hesitate to wear a Rolex as well

 

[SonReir671]

it's a very subjective question and I think everyone answers exclusively from the perspective of their own preferences. personally, i love rolex and i've got some, and i have tudor and i also have got some. Over time, I came to the conclusion that Tudor is superb for its money and offers everything you need from a watch. Rolex- well a bit overpriced for me, and ean- watches work exactly the same as tudor but cost 3 times more. But, I admit that I buy them for value and reputation

 

[Calatrava]

I follow other forums as well and I notice that there are many enthusiasts who claim that Rolex watches would last better than Tudor due to the better movements. She is not so sure here and I think it is a misinterpretation. I think it is wrong to assume that a watch will last longer just because it is more expensive. in the end, the difference between rolex and tudor is the slightly better quality of the materials, for example stainless steel, which is more corrosion-resistant. The movement might also be higher-spec, but does that translate into longer longevity?

I think that if you take care and maintain the watch as recommended by the manufacturer, longevity should not be a problem. So, I trust Tudor to the fullest and relate better with it for the price-quality balance. I'm more PRO Tudor than pro Rolex, tbh

 

[UdlinINTEL]

haha lol) that's a gut one) I think that a few years ago, no one could have convinced me to get myself a Tudor instead of a Rolex. Now I have a Rolex, even 2, a rep and a gen one. Now I'm dreaming of a Tudor and I'm sure I'll have one one day... I think the obsession with Rolex is somehow subjective, partially. After you have one, you understand that it is a phenomenal watch, but at the same time you understand that you overestimated your expectations. Tudor is very confident on the market and I really like what he is doing. It is very authentic and I think that if it were not a subsidiary company to Rolex, Tudor would be a real threat to Rolex on the long run

 

[CityBreak]

love the Rolexes, but I think the brand has gotten a little cocky lately. I prefer the comfort of a professional customer assistant than standing in line for years until I receive "the call".

in addition, Tudor made an exceptional technical leap lately. Rolexes might be more durable with more sophisticated materials and everything you want.

But Tudor's capabilities comfort me perfectly and I don't think I will suffer much if I don't have a Rolex. So Tudor is my choice in every aspect, including the price

 

[GeorgeClintonBiden]

I don't think we can only answer with black and white regarding these 2 strong brands. If we remove the age of Tudor vs Rolex from the equation, both brands have a very strong voice in the industry. Obviously, rolex is probably more resounding, without a doubt, but Tudor steps firmly behind it. For me, it all depends on the watch line. So I could not generalize without going into details. Everyone wins on a certain field according to me and it goes as follows:

Submariner line is better in Tudor (please note it's my own subjective opinion)!!!
GMT with reasonable proportions is better at Rolex
If we talk about Subariners Date: I prefer Rolex
If it's about dtejust= Rolex
If it's about the chrono, it's about the same level as both Tudor panda and Daytona Rolex. He couldn't decide, both comfort him;

OP is definitely Tudor, while Day Date i would go for a Rolex.
And if it's about Explorers, it's definitely Rolex for me, no room for interpretation